Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Chairman Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., and House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Frank Pallone Jr., D-N.J., along with Energy and Commerce Republican Leader Greg Walden, R-Ore., Dec. 8  they have reached an agreement on legislation to address surprise medical billing.

According to a section-by-section summary, the bill would, among other provisions, prohibit balance billing in certain scenarios. Specifically, patients would be required to pay only the in-network cost-sharing amount for out-of-network emergency care (including air ambulance services), for certain ancillary services provided by out-of-network providers at in-network facilities, and for out-of-network care provided at in-network facilities without the patient鈥檚 informed consent. The amount the patient pays in cost-sharing for the out-of-network services subject to the balance billing protections would count towards their in-network deductible.

Insurers would be required to, at a minimum, reimburse providers for all claims subject to the balance billing prohibition at the median in-network negotiated rate for the service in that geographic area where the service was delivered. Both providers and insurers would have the right to contest claims paid at or above $750 ($25,000 for air ambulance services) using baseball-style, binding arbitration.

The bill also would restrict certain contracting terms between providers and health plans. Specifically, they would enable health plans to tier providers, steer patients to particular providers, and contract with only certain providers or 鈥渃herry-pick鈥 within a hospital system. 

鈥淎merica鈥檚 hospitals and health systems are committed to protecting patients from unanticipated medical bills that they may incur because of gaps in their insurance coverage or as a result of emergencies,鈥 AHA President and CEO Rick Pollack said. 鈥溾 We urge Congress to take the time to get this policy right, and not rush a solution to surprise medical bills that would cause this level of disruption to the patients we serve.鈥 

Related News Articles

Headline
The AHA filed an amicus brief Oct. 4 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit challenging a decision by the U.S. District Court for the Northern鈥
Headline
The Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services Aug. 20 released a report presenting data on complaints and enforcement efforts by the agency concerning title鈥
Headline
The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals Aug. 2 affirmed a district court's decision to set aside certain regulations implementing the No Surprises Act. In particular鈥
Headline
The departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and the Treasury will reopen the public comment period for their proposed rule to improve the No Surprises鈥
Headline
The departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and the Treasury Dec. 18 released a final rule that increases the administrative fee for disputes initiated鈥
Headline
The departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and the Treasury will give health care providers and insurers initiating a payment dispute through Jan. 16鈥