The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals Aug. 2 a district court's decision to set aside certain regulations implementing the No Surprises Act. In particular, the decision invalidates regulatory provisions governing how arbitrators are to weigh the qualifying payment amount in arbitration proceedings.   

鈥淸N]othing in the Act instructs arbitrators to weigh any one factor or circumstance more heavily than the others, nor does the Act authorize the Departments to superimpose regulatory rules on the clear statutory mandate,鈥 the 5th Circuit explained. 鈥淭he Final Rule therefore exceeds the Departments鈥 authority.鈥 Also using language that the AHA repeatedly offered in its briefing, the court of appeals held: 鈥淏y telling the arbitrators that they must consider the QPA before all other factors, the Departments place a thumb on the scale in favor of the insurer-determined QPA in derogation of the other congressionally mandated factors. It would distort the statutory scheme for the Departments to impose such an extrastatutory requirement here.鈥

The AHA had long advocated for this position, including in an amicus brief in 2022 and a lawsuit against federal agencies in 2021.

Related News Articles

Headline
The AHA filed an amicus brief Oct. 4 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit challenging a decision by the U.S. District Court for the Northern鈥
Headline
The Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services Aug. 20 released a report presenting data on complaints and enforcement efforts by the agency concerning title鈥
Headline
The departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and the Treasury will reopen the public comment period for their proposed rule to improve the No Surprises鈥
Headline
The departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and the Treasury Dec. 18 released a final rule that increases the administrative fee for disputes initiated鈥
Headline
The departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and the Treasury will give health care providers and insurers initiating a payment dispute through Jan. 16鈥
Headline
In response to recent court decisions that set aside certain regulations implementing the No Surprises Act鈥檚 Independent Dispute Resolution process, the鈥