In a letter submitted July 2 to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on guidance for the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program, the AHA expressed concern about the agency鈥檚 proposal to retrospectively effectuate the policy.

The AHA called CMS鈥 retrospective refund process 鈥渃omplex, burdensome and would be operationally unworkable,鈥 and could unwillingly cause providers to pursue rebates and 340B discounts from drug manufacturers instead of requiring them to make lower negotiated prices available upfront. The AHA urged CMS to finalize a prospective process that aligns with the Health Resources and Services Administration鈥檚 historic interpretation of the 340B statutory requirements and balances the interests of Medicare patients, dispensing entities and manufacturers under the program.

Related News Articles

Headline
Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee Chairman Bill Cassidy, M.D., R-La., today released a report detailing findings from an investigation鈥
Headline
The AHA April 18 filed friend-of-the-court briefs in three cases in support of Louisiana's 340B contract pharmacy law that prohibits drug companies from鈥
Headline
A Minnesota state court April 15 dismissed a lawsuit filed by PhRMA challenging the state鈥檚 law protecting 340B pricing for contract pharmacy arrangements. The鈥
Headline
The White House April 15 released an executive order directing federal agencies to undertake a broad range of tasks aimed at reducing the costs of prescription鈥
News
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services April 7 released finalized payment rates for calendar year 2026 Medicare Advantage and Part D plans. Payments鈥
Headline
The AHA today urged the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission to take specific actions on physician fee schedule payments following recommendations the鈥