In this week, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator Seema Verma hinted at some of the coming changes to the agency鈥檚 Stark Law regulations. 鈥淪ome of the changes include clarifying the regulatory definitions of volume or value, commercial reasonableness and fair market value; addressing issues such as lack of signature, incorrect dates or other areas of technical noncompliance; and updating the regulation to address a world in which there are cybersecurity and electronic health records requirements,鈥 Verma said at a Federation of 黑料正能量s conference. 鈥淭his will represent the most significant changes to the Stark law since its inception. It is our hope that these changes will help spur better care coordination and help support our work to remove barriers to innovation while continuing to provide appropriate safeguards for our programs.鈥 Responding last year to a CMS request for information on reducing the Stark Law鈥檚 regulatory burdens, AHA urged the agency to create or adapt compensation exceptions to the law to enable hospitals and physicians to coordinate care and improve patient outcomes. 

Related News Articles

Perspective
Fair competition has always been the driving principle of our nation鈥檚 economy. This includes health care, and it鈥檚 the reason the Ethics in Patient Referrals鈥
Headline
As some members of Congress propose to weaken Medicare鈥檚 prohibition on physician self-referral to new physician-owned hospitals and ease restrictions on their鈥
Blog
A new study funded by Patient Rights Advocate adds to the evidence that physician-owned hospitals (POHs) are not comparable to or substitutes for full-service鈥
Headline
Physician-owned hospitals are 鈥渘ot good for patients, communities, the integrity of the Medicare program, or providers who are actually in the business of鈥
Blog
For decades, the Ethics in Patient Referrals Act (鈥淪tark Law鈥) has protected the Medicare program, its beneficiaries and communities from the inherent conflict鈥
Headline
The AHA and the Federation of 黑料正能量s are urging Congress to oppose the Patient Access to Higher Quality Care Act (H.R. 977/S.470) and any other鈥