A new paper by two respected economists “throws cold water” on an untested theory that claims competition falls and prices rise when hospitals in distant geographies combine, writes Melinda Reid Hatton, AHA general counsel and senior vice president, in an AHASTAT . Among its flaw, the theory defines geographic markets too restrictively; fails to account for quality improvements, capital investments and the value of system membership; discounts the ability of health plans to replace the hospitals in their networks; and uses highly aggregated data that obscures any price difference among payers, the economists note.

Related News Articles

Headline
The Department of Justice March 27 announced it is launching an Anticompetitive Regulations Task Force to advocate for “the elimination of anticompetitive…
Headline
A report released Jan. 9 by Kaufman Hall highlights hospital and health system merger and acquisition activity from last year.  The report said that…
Headline
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce Jan. 13 filed a lawsuit against the Federal Trade Commission, saying changes made by the FTC to premerger notification rules under…
Headline
In this conversation, Dylan Panuska, clinical psychologist and manager of behavioral health integration with Endeavor Health, showcases examples of how…
Headline
In this Leadership Dialogue conversation, Tom Priselac, president and CEO emeritus of Cedars-Sinai, discusses overseeing 30 years of growth and integration at…
Headline
The Federal Trade Commission Oct. 10 finalized changes to the premerger notification rules, form and instructions under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust…